Author Guidelines

E-ISSN: 3084-0252 P-ISSN: 3084-0260
Comprehensive Submission Guidelines

Global Insight Journal welcomes original, high-quality, and ethically conducted scholarly work from researchers, academicians, practitioners, policymakers, professionals, and postgraduate scholars across the world.

Authors are requested to read these guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript. Following the journal’s requirements helps ensure smooth editorial processing, fair peer review, and timely communication throughout the publication process.

The journal publishes interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research that contributes to academic knowledge, professional practice, policy discussion, innovation, and social development.

Accepted Submission Categories

Manuscripts must address contemporary local, regional, or global issues across these structured formats:

Original Research
Review Articles
Systematic Reviews
Conceptual Papers
Case Studies
Policy Analyses
Short Communications
Methodological Studies
Perspective Papers
Book Reviews
Multidisciplinary Papers
Exclusive Submission Pledge

Simultaneous processing of the same file across multiple journals is completely banned. A manuscript under consideration by Global Insight Journal should not be submitted elsewhere until a final editorial decision has been officially communicated. Reusing significant third-party visual elements, graphics, tables, or instruments requires capturing official copyright permissions before file ingest.

Style & Typography Sheet

Manuscripts must be configured in clear Microsoft Word formats (.doc/.docx):

Font: Times New Roman, 12pt
Spacing: 1.5 or Double Spacing
Page Layout: A4, Normal Margins
Alignment: Justified, Numbered
Citation Style: APA 7th Edition Framework
Manuscript Core Structural Blueprint
• Title, Abstract, & Keywords Concise, informative title stripped of vague expressions. Abstract spans between 150 and 300 words, charting context, objectives, methodology, main findings, and conclusions (no citations allowed). Include 4 to 6 relevant search keywords below the text block.
• Introduction & Literature Review Establishes the research problem, hypotheses, and core arguments. The review should critically analyze existing scholarly debates to isolate clear research gaps rather than merely summarizing earlier works.
• Methodology, Results, & Discussion Matrices Methodology requires sufficient details regarding population sampling, collection tools, and data analysis framework fields. Results must present outcomes cleanly paired with numbered, captioned visuals. The discussion maps interpretations evidence-base style, directly contrasting data arrays with prior literature paradigms.
Anonymity Shield & Separate Title Page Requirements

To preserve isolated double-blind evaluations, author profile metadata elements must be completely separated from the technical manuscript text by uploading two distinct files:

  • • Document 1: Separate Title Page Must contain full manuscript title, all author names, institutional affiliations, departments, country, corresponding email, ORCID iD codes, author contribution statements, funding logs, and conflict declarations.
  • • Document 2: Blind Manuscript File Must feature the full text layout completely stripped of author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, personal self-citations (e.g., use neutral text instead of "in our previous study"), or tracking properties in document settings.
Authorship Eligibility Criteria

Profiles require direct participation across core elements:

Study Conception • Data Collection • Findings Interpretation • Manuscript Development • Critical Revision • Final Version Approval.
* Technical, administrative, editing, or funding support alone belongs within an Acknowledgements block.
Participant Ethical Clearances

Research involving human participants, focus interviews, surveys, or sensitive health data must include formal institutional review board (IRB) ethical clearances, informed consent confirmations, and data anonymization parameters. Identifiable personal features must be completely redacted.

Mandatory Declaration Templates
• Generative AI Tools Rule AI computing systems are limited to language polish or writing assistance. AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Substantive AI assistance beyond editing must be completely declared inside the text file or cover letter.
• Conflict of Interest Declaration Authors must disclose any financial links, consultancies, or rivalries. If free of conflicts, utilize: "The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest."
• Funding Statement Disclose financial backing organizations and grant IDs. If unsupported, utilize: "This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial entity, or not-for-profit organization."
• Data Availability Statement Specify dataset accessibility. Example template: "The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request."
Final Pre-Submission Validation Checklist

Before routing document packets into our submission gateway system, verify the following parameters:

• File fits the multidisciplinary scope of Global Insight Journal.
• Script is completely original and not active in review loops elsewhere.
• Title page and blind manuscript file are structured as separate documents.
• Abstract text spans 150-300 words and 4-6 keywords are included.
• Tables, visual figures, and APA 7th references are sequentially cited.
• Required ethical, consent, funding, and data statements are compiled.
• Grammar, language clarity, and formatting consistencies are audited.
• Collective group consensus has been secured across all listed co-authors.
Post-Acceptance Production & Correspondence Protocol

Following formal article acceptance, files enter production for typesetting, layout styling, and text copyediting. Authors evaluate a final proof copy for prompt confirmation of minor production errors. Major modifications to findings, conclusion structures, or author lists cannot be executed at this proof stage.

Note: All official dispatches route exclusively through the primary corresponding author, who preserves the core duty of updating the complete co-author group regarding active status changes.